In more than 20 years I've spent studying the issue, I have yet to
hear a convincing argument that college football has anything do with
what is presumably the primary purpose of higher education: academics.
That's because college football has no
academic purpose. Which is why it needs to be banned. A radical
solution, yes. But necessary in today's times.
Football only provides the thickest
layer of distraction in an atmosphere in which colleges and universities
these days are all about distraction, nursing an obsession with the
social well-being of students as opposed to the obsession that they are
there for the vital and single purpose of learning as much as they can
to compete in the brutal realities of the global economy.
Who
truly benefits from college football? Alumni who absurdly judge the
quality of their alma mater based on the quality of the football team.
Coaches such as Nick Saban of the University of Alabama and Bob Stoops
of Oklahoma University who make obscene millions. The players themselves
don't benefit, exploited by a system in which they don't receive a dime
of compensation. The average student doesn't benefit, particularly when
football programs remain sacrosanct while tuition costs show no signs
of abating as many governors are slashing budgets to the bone.
If the vast majority of major college
football programs made money, the argument to ban football might be a
more precarious one. But too many of them don't—to the detriment of
academic budgets at all too many schools. According to the NCAA, 43% of
the 120 schools in the Football Bowl Subdivision lost money on their
programs. This is the tier of schools that includes such examples as
that great titan of football excellence, the University of Alabama at
Birmingham Blazers, who went 3-and-9 last season. The athletic
department in 2008-2009 took in over $13 million in university funds and
student fees, largely because the football program cost so much, The
Wall Street Journal reported. New Mexico State University's athletic
department needed a 70% subsidy in 2009-2010, largely because Aggie
football hasn't gotten to a bowl game in 51 years. Outside of Las
Cruces, where New Mexico State is located, how many people even know
that the school has a football program? None, except maybe for some
savvy contestants on "Jeopardy." What purpose does it serve on a
university campus? None.
To read the complete article by Buzz Bissinger in the Wall Street Journal, click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment